The philosophy and psychology of orgasm denial and enforced male chastity in female dominant relationships varies considerably among participants.
The role and value of a chastity device – CB-3000, Curve, and the like – also values.
Would you say a male chastity restraint:
- Is necessary because men can’t be trusted?
- Enhances the man’s pleasure?
- Woman’s Pleasure?
- Both?
- It excites the man the most?
- The woman?
- Is the device a psychological tool?
- Just a toy?
- Is it a fun form of bondage?
- Chastity devices should be used only if necessary?
- Chastity devices are bad: orgasm denial should only be done on the honor system?
What are your own feelings about them?
Originally posted 2007-03-26 15:23:30.
Related posts:
Hi there,
I have been in male chastity and would like to comment on this subject.
I think male chastity enforced by a device is an impressive way to serve your Mistress.
The reason for this is not that a man can’t be trusted (trust is the basis of every D/s relationship!).
The reason is that by my experience it is one of the most complete ways to serve your Mistress. It makes you feel that more dependent on Her and totally under Her control.
How easy is it for Her to just deny to unlock you for one (or more …) days.
For me it was a nice period in which I felt even more compelled to please Her in every way I could.
Then there was the teasing: She would excite me even wearing the device and then I felt “betrayed” by my own cock. I knew it would be uncomfortable when I would get excited being in the CB and still it happened (often).
I know I felt very submissive wearing the CB and I remember it as being a very submissive period.
One more added benefit for my Mistress was (after a while): I knew when She was using me, playing with me, I wouldn’t be able to cum, so automatically all my effort was directed at Her pleasure.
The way it is supposed to be …