By Mule on Female Led Relationships:
But the biggest reason girls are superior to boys at this age is that they form alliances easier. This is man’s downfall. No, not “us” man, but our cousin the Neanderthals. In a one-on-one competition, my money is on the Neanderthal. He’s tougher and better at surviving against nature. However, our cousins are extinct. Why? Because while as individuals they were superior, as a group they were inferior and rarely formed coalitions greater than an extended family. Homo sapiens went on to form tribes, city-states and nation-states.
In a not-so-much-more-current example, I can recall an incident at the playground. The girls were on the swings, a girl would not get off her swing until there was another girl waiting to get on. She would jump off, and hold the swing for the next girl, handing it to her. The boys never got a chance.
Boys compete, girls clan.
The whole thing: When Girls are Better than Boys
Originally posted 2008-05-23 14:28:58.
No related posts.
but aren’t homo sapiens ALSO men?? didn’t men build tribes, city-states, nation-states?
isn’t competition superior than clanning? One is based on ability, the other is based on nepotism.
Do you have a macro assigned to that to spare you the trouble of typing it in on multiple web sites?
a “macro”?? Ya so I copied and pasted it to put it on the other blogs it was posted. Nothing wrong with saving time.
Let’s keep sexual fantasies and anthropological theories separate. Mixing two is always embarrasing.