Madame Cane writes about humiliating a male, particularly in reference to cuckoldry:
Femdom lifestyles and fantasies can include so many different fetishes, but humiliation is always the most important element at the root of it all. There are stereotypes in the vanilla world of what it means to sexually dominate & humiliate a man. They always see the dungeon-bitch with the whip, the dog collar on the slave, and yes, there are many of those. But dominance can be softer, and quieter too, yet pack the same sting to his ego. The same effect on his willingness to serve his mistress.
Seriously, what is with the prevalence of (completely blind) preachers in stereotypical femdom? Did these women just never learn the word “I” or the phrase “for me” or the very concept of self while growing up? Is that why such things are so mysteriously missing from their entirely absolutist world view? It’s such a shame, because everything except that bit might have been really hot otherwise.
One cannot debunk the myth of a particular stereotype by using vastly over-simplified and generalized stereotypical premises and notions. A blog is an on-going piece of work, a combination of thoughts, ideas, and emotions that are ever evolving. Casting aspersions about something that is not a finished work (and never will be), makes one question if you really read and understood the post. The pot calling the kettle black is an unprofitable expenditure of time and energy.